An open question to Mark Levin

Ok, we get it.

The commie bastards on the left use the law to further their ends but do not follow it when it gets in their way.

Every now and then, the judicial branch tells the executive branch to stop. The executive branch ignores the judicial branch. The judicial branch says “no, really, stop!” (or in legal jargon, holds the executive branch in contempt).

the executive branch ignores them.

The executive branch gains control, I incrementally lose my freedom under the constitution.

That is the pattern.

Now, what pisses me off about you talk-radio pundits is you mostly pontificate  about it instead of offering solutions. (to be fair to you, Mr. Levin, you have said that a lawyer in some place needs to bring this back to the court).

The law is an ass and a pain in my ass and as a free man, I get very pissed when I have divert my attention from what I like to do, to what you lawyers do.

So, please, so I can get over the dad-gum pontification, help me complete the sequence.

Here is scenario 1:
Commie bastards break the law–>federal judge says no–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>federal judge holds the commie bastards in contempt–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>(insert legal solution here)–>all is well and done.

Here is scenario 2:

Commie bastards break the law–>federal judge says no–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>federal judge holds the commie bastards in contempt–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>(no legal solution here)–>civil war.
Here is scenario 3:
()

Here is my beef with all commentators I have heard on t.v. or radio…
You do this:

Commie bastards break the law–>federal judge says no–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>federal judge holds the commie bastards in contempt–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>(conservative commentary: “Commie bastards break the law–>federal judge says no–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>federal judge holds the commie bastards in contempt–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>(conservative commentary: “Commie bastards break the law–>federal judge says no–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>federal judge holds the commie bastards in contempt–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>(conservative commentary: “Commie bastards break the law–>federal judge says no–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>federal judge holds the commie bastards in contempt–>commie bastards ignore the federal judge–>”)”)

i.e. A freaking recursive loop.

DUDE(s)

Break the freaking recursion

grrrrrrrr.

its been a long day.

__s_i_m_p_l_y__t_i_m_o_t_h_y__

Advertisements

Posted on February 5, 2011, in tyrannical. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: